rackbrazerzkidai.blogg.se

Flickery interrogation room
Flickery interrogation room













She collected these stones and brought them to the barrack. One day, dodging the stones flying at them, the exhausted Gertrude stumbled and fell face down on these stones, and she suddenly felt that these stones smelled. “It was very disappointing and painful,” recalled Gertrude Platais and other former prisoners. The guards began to laugh out loud: they say, you see, not only in Moscow, you here, in the aul, even children do not like. The children at the command of the elders began to stone the tormented women. Old people and children - local residents of a neighboring Kazakh village jumped out of the reeds.

flickery interrogation room

Once, women prisoners, under a reinforced convoy, collected reeds on the shore of Lake Zhalanash for the construction of barracks. During her arrival from Germany in 1990 she told the “ALZHIR” museum stuff how she first time saw local kazakhs: I created this installation based on a story of a former prisoner of Akmola camp of traitor’s wives, Gertrude Platais. My work is dedicated to the first contact of different peoples migrated to Kazakhstan with kazakh people. Listening to the voice of each artist individually, you can catch unobvious connections, general semiotics, signs and language that have yet to be deciphered. Answering this question, the “First Contact” exhibition presents a multitude of individual stories that intersecting build a common network like a cloud of keywords.

#Flickery interrogation room how to#

This raises the question of how to present a generation outside the universal concept, seeking to build a harmonious narrative excluding everything that does not fit into it. This largely Eurocentric theory considers global historical processes, focusing on the history of America as a universal model, but this approach doesn’t take into account the local as the view of the other excluded from world history. In the theory of generations, differences between generations are presented as common grounds for a certain age group, of which the authors Strauss and How, draw conclusions about common beliefs, values and behaviors among people who grew up in one historical period. Being carriers of hybrid identity, this new tribe is in a certain sense mutants, still retaining the agency of each of the stages of the transformation process. With the completion of the Soviet project, the end of utopia, which nevertheless has not yet arrived, today we can conclude that a new generation of Kazakhstanis is also a product of this permanent laboratory. Saying goodbye to the hegemony of social realism, artists began to occupy a special role in the reflection on complex social and political changes. At that time, following a sharp geopolitical impetus and the emergence of a number of new independent republics, artists whose work did not coincide with the ideals of the party came out of basements and close apartment exhibitions. The period of the collapse of the Soviet Union can also be considered as a starting point in the appearance of Kazakhstani modern art. The usual horizon of the steppe closed the industrial constructions marking the progress.Ī new generation of artists represented at this exhibition hasn’t met life in the USSR, but grew up in an environment where the trail of slowly escaping Sovietism still exists, where the experience of living in a communist project emerges as a phantom flicker of images about the collective dream of space exploration, portraits of the living and at the same time photos of the dead Lenin. In the 20th century Kazakhstan was a country that became a platform for large-scale experiments: a change of social structure and a sharp transition of nomads to sedentary life, the construction of a cosmodrome in the steppes, the launch of a man into space, testing of nuclear weapons. The memory of all these three generations holds a large reservoir of different cultural layers.

flickery interrogation room

Mukhtar Auezov, described the difference between generations as a conflict between the traditional tribal way of life with the new urban culture and secular society in his last novel “Young Tribe” in 1977.Ĭonsidering the history of the country as the history of several generations, we can say that the new young tribe described by Auezov, today are parents of the independence age-mates. Through art created by young artists, this exhibition addresses the issue of the experience that has shaped the new generation. The focus of this exhibition is a new generation of independent Kazakhstan, those who were born during the fall of the Iron Curtain.













Flickery interrogation room